1Panel vs arcane

Self-hosted server and Docker management compared

1Panel and arcane are Go projects that provide web interfaces for managing self-hosted infrastructure. 1Panel covers broader Linux server administration and AI services, while arcane focuses on Docker containers and Compose projects.

1Panelarcane
LanguageGoGo
LicenseGPL-3.0BSD-3-Clause
Stars37.1k7.7k
Forks3.4k323
Last analyzedOct 3, 2026Oct 3, 2026

Key differences

  • 1Panel combines host, file, database, container, website, backup, and AI management; arcane focuses on Docker containers and Compose workflows.
  • 1Panel includes an application marketplace, website deployment tools, and security controls; arcane centers on a Docker management UI.
  • 1Panel is licensed under GPL-3.0, while arcane is licensed under BSD-3-Clause.
  • 1Panel’s quick-start instructions require shell access to the Linux server; arcane directs users to its documentation for installation and configuration.
  • 1Panel reports 37.1k stars and 3.4k forks, compared with arcane’s 7.7k stars and 323 forks.

Choose 1Panel if you…

  • need a web interface for broader Linux server administration, including databases, files, and backups.
  • want to deploy websites or manage AI agents and models alongside server applications.
  • prefer a centralized panel with an application marketplace and security controls.
Read the 1Panel analysis →

Choose arcane if you…

  • already operate Docker and want a dedicated visual management interface.
  • work with Compose projects and want a UI alongside command-line tools.
  • want to contribute to interface translations through the linked Crowdin project.
Read the arcane analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.