copyparty vs zipline
Self-hosted file sharing and upload servers compared
copyparty and zipline both let you host files for browser-based access and sharing. copyparty focuses on flexible file serving across multiple network protocols, while zipline centers on upload workflows, ShareX integration, and organizing shared content.
copyparty: Share and Upload Files from a Portable Server
Copyparty is a portable file server for browsing, sharing, and transferring files through a web browser or network protocols. It suits people who want a flexible self-hosted file hub without a large dependency stack.
zipline: Self-Host a ShareX File Upload Server
Zipline is a self-hosted server for ShareX uploads and file sharing, with a web interface for managing files, folders, tags, and links. It suits individuals and teams who want control over uploads and integrations, and can run with Docker and PostgreSQL.
| copyparty | zipline | |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 46.9k | 3.5k |
| Forks | 1.9k | 260 |
| Last analyzed | Oct 3, 2026 | Oct 11, 2026 |
Key differences
- copyparty serves files over HTTP(S), WebDAV, SFTP, FTP(S), TFTP, and SMB/CIFS; zipline emphasizes uploads, links, and a web interface.
- copyparty includes file browsing, search, resumable uploads, and media tools; zipline adds folders, tags, shortened URLs, embeds, and ShareX workflows.
- copyparty is written in Python and emphasizes portability with optional dependencies; zipline is written in TypeScript and recommends Docker with PostgreSQL.
- copyparty can expose local folders with configurable accounts and per-folder permissions; zipline supports local or S3-compatible storage, quotas, and password-protected uploads.
- copyparty has 46.9k stars and 1.9k forks, compared with zipline's 3.4k stars and 257 forks.
- Both projects use the MIT license and are not archived.
Choose copyparty if you…
- need access to files through several network protocols, including WebDAV or FTP.
- want a portable file server for browsing, searching, and transferring files.
- need per-folder permissions or resumable, chunked uploads.
Choose zipline if you…
- use ShareX or want an API-driven upload workflow.
- want to organize uploads with folders and tags, and share them using shortened URLs or embeds.
- need local or S3-compatible storage with quotas and upload-related integrations.
Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects
This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.