trafilatura vs sitefetch

Website text extraction tools compared

trafilatura and sitefetch both collect readable content from websites for text-based workflows. trafilatura focuses on structured extraction, metadata, and multiple output formats, while sitefetch crawls site pages into a text file.

trafilaturasitefetch
LanguagePythonTypeScript
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
Stars6.9k1.7k
Forks447163
Last analyzedOct 3, 2026Oct 3, 2026

Key differences

  • trafilatura is a Python library and CLI; sitefetch is a TypeScript library and CLI.
  • trafilatura extracts metadata and document structure, while sitefetch focuses on readable page content saved to a text file.
  • trafilatura supports live URLs, local HTML, and parsed HTML trees; sitefetch is described as fetching pages across a website.
  • trafilatura can discover URLs from sitemaps and feeds and offers multiple export formats; sitefetch supports URL path patterns and a custom CSS content selector.
  • trafilatura uses its own rule-based extractor with jusText and readability-lxml as fallbacks; sitefetch uses Mozilla Readability.
  • trafilatura is licensed under Apache-2.0 and sitefetch under MIT. Both are listed as not archived.

Choose trafilatura if you…

  • need extracted metadata, structured document content, or varied export formats.
  • want to process local HTML or discover URLs from sitemaps and feeds.
  • are building a Python-based content-processing or corpus pipeline.
Read the trafilatura analysis →

Choose sitefetch if you…

  • want to save content from across a website into a text file.
  • need to limit a crawl to matching URL paths or set a CSS content selector.
  • want a TypeScript API for automating site-content collection.
Read the sitefetch analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.