agent-skills vs oh-my-hermes

Engineering workflows for AI coding agents, compared

agent-skills provides portable engineering workflows for coding agents across the development lifecycle. oh-my-hermes extends Hermes Agent with task routing, governed workflows, verification tracking, and reviewed project memory, so the main difference is broad tool portability versus a Hermes-focused operating layer.

agent-skillsoh-my-hermes
LanguageJavaScriptPython
LicenseMITMIT
Stars109k3.1k
Forks11.3k240
Last analyzedOct 20, 2026Oct 3, 2026

Key differences

  • agent-skills packages lifecycle skills and slash commands for multiple coding-agent tools; oh-my-hermes is an extension for Hermes Agent with explicit handoffs to Claude Code or Codex.
  • agent-skills emphasizes requirements, planning, implementation, testing, review, and shipping; oh-my-hermes adds task routing, parallel work units, execution tracking, and project memory.
  • agent-skills is written in JavaScript, while oh-my-hermes is written in Python.
  • Both projects use the MIT license.
  • agent-skills reports 101k stars and 10.6k forks; oh-my-hermes reports 3.1k stars and 240 forks.

Choose agent-skills if you…

  • need portable engineering workflows across multiple coding-agent tools.
  • want structured lifecycle guidance, including requirements, testing, review, and release.
  • prefer to adopt individual skills or adapt workflows to an existing codebase.
Read the agent-skills analysis →

Choose oh-my-hermes if you…

  • already use Hermes Agent and want to add governed workflows to it.
  • want task routing, parallel implementation, and separate execution and verification states.
  • need reviewed, file-backed project memory or explicit tracked handoffs to Codex or Claude Code.
Read the oh-my-hermes analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.