afilmory vs Lychee

Photo galleries compared: afilmory and Lychee

afilmory and Lychee both let people present and share photo collections through a web gallery. afilmory focuses on syncing and processing images from several sources with rich viewing features, while Lychee is a self-hosted photo-management application centered on uploading, organizing, and sharing.

afilmoryLychee
LanguageTypeScriptPHP
License—MIT
Stars2.6k4.3k
Forks325381
Last analyzedOct 6, 2026Oct 3, 2026

Key differences

  • afilmory syncs from S3-compatible storage, GitHub, Eagle, or local files; Lychee provides a web application for uploading and managing photos.
  • afilmory offers a hosted service or self-hosting; Lychee is run on your own server or web space, with Docker Compose recommended in its documentation.
  • afilmory includes EXIF details, GPS maps, a WebGL viewer, and image-format processing; Lychee focuses on photo management and sharing through its web interface.
  • afilmory is written in TypeScript and reports its license as NOASSERTION; Lychee is written in PHP and uses the MIT license.
  • Lychee has more reported stars and forks than afilmory: 4.3k stars and 381 forks, compared with 2.6k stars and 324 forks.

Choose afilmory if you…

  • want a hosted gallery option or the choice to self-host.
  • need to sync images from sources such as S3-compatible storage, GitHub, Eagle, or local files.
  • want gallery features such as EXIF details, GPS maps, or a WebGL viewer.
Read the afilmory analysis →

Choose Lychee if you…

  • want to upload, organize, and share photos from your own server or web space.
  • prefer a deployment path based on Docker Compose.
  • want a PHP application with an MIT license.
Read the Lychee analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.