aptabase vs bklit

Privacy-focused app analytics compared with website analytics

aptabase provides session-focused analytics for mobile, desktop, and web apps, with managed cloud and self-hosting options. bklit focuses on website events, sessions, and funnels, but is discontinued and no longer maintained.

aptabasebklit
LanguageC#TypeScript
LicenseAGPL-3.0NOASSERTION
Stars1.8k268
Forks14125
Last analyzedOct 15, 2026Oct 3, 2026

Key differences

  • aptabase covers mobile, desktop, and web apps, while bklit focuses on website analytics such as pageviews and conversion funnels.
  • aptabase describes session-focused analytics that avoids unique identifiers; bklit highlights live updates through WebSockets and event storage in ClickHouse.
  • aptabase offers a managed cloud service or self-hosting, while bklit’s hosted service and self-hosted infrastructure are no longer maintained.
  • aptabase is not archived; bklit is archived and discontinued.
  • aptabase’s server uses AGPL-3.0 and its SDKs are described as MIT-licensed; bklit’s repository metadata says NOASSERTION while its README says MIT, so verify licensing before reuse.

Choose aptabase if you…

  • need analytics for mobile, desktop, or web apps, with SDKs for multiple platforms
  • want session-focused analytics designed to avoid unique identifiers
  • prefer a managed service or can maintain a self-hosted server
Read the aptabase analysis →

Choose bklit if you…

  • are an existing user reviewing or maintaining an installation, accounting for its discontinued status
  • want to study an architecture combining a browser SDK, real-time updates, and ClickHouse
  • are comparing self-hosted analytics designs rather than choosing a maintained production deployment
Read the bklit analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.