opik vs promptfoo

LLM tracing and evaluation tools compared

opik and promptfoo both help teams evaluate LLM applications. opik combines tracing, evaluation, and production monitoring in a platform, while promptfoo focuses on prompt and model comparisons, red-teaming, and CI/CD checks.

opikpromptfoo
LanguagePythonTypeScript
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
Stars22.8k26.4k
Forks1.9k2.6k
Last analyzedOct 22, 2026Oct 24, 2026

Key differences

  • opik traces nested model calls, tools, retrieval, and agent workflows; promptfoo compares prompt and model outputs and tests applications for vulnerabilities.
  • opik includes production dashboards, online evaluation, datasets, experiments, and prompt tools; promptfoo centers on automated evaluations and security checks.
  • opik is built with Python and TypeScript SDKs, a web application, and a backend; promptfoo is a TypeScript CLI and library.
  • opik is licensed under Apache-2.0; promptfoo is licensed under MIT.
  • opik can run through Comet Cloud or be self-hosted; promptfoo describes evaluations as local and is available through its CLI or Node.js package.
  • opik supports evaluation in CI/CD through a PyTest integration; promptfoo supports CI/CD evaluation and security checks.

Choose opik if you…

  • need to inspect multi-step agent, tool, and retrieval traces
  • want production monitoring alongside datasets, experiments, and evaluations
  • need the option to use Comet Cloud or self-host the platform
Read the opik analysis →

Choose promptfoo if you…

  • want to compare prompts and models across supported providers
  • need red-team tests or vulnerability scans for an LLM application
  • want a TypeScript CLI or Node.js package for local evaluations and CI/CD checks
Read the promptfoo analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.