crater vs FOSSBilling

Invoice and billing systems compared

crater and FOSSBilling are PHP projects for invoicing and payment workflows. crater focuses on invoices, estimates, expenses, and customer-facing billing, while FOSSBilling centers on client and billing management for online service businesses, especially hosting providers.

craterFOSSBilling
LanguagePHPPHP
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
Stars8.3k1.7k
Forks1.7k359
Last analyzedOct 3, 2026Oct 15, 2026

Key differences

  • crater includes expense tracking, estimates, recurring invoices, multiple companies, and a customer invoice portal; FOSSBilling focuses on client management, billing reminders, and reports.
  • crater offers companion Android and iOS apps, while FOSSBilling describes a responsive interface for desktop and mobile.
  • crater uses the AGPL-3.0 license; FOSSBilling uses Apache-2.0.
  • crater is presented as a deployable invoicing system, while FOSSBilling is explicitly self-hosted and requires a suitable LAMP or LEMP environment.
  • FOSSBilling is in beta and cautions users to expect rough edges and limited support; crater's supplied considerations note 425 open issues and a latest recorded push on 2024-08-10.

Choose crater if you…

  • need to manage estimates, expenses, payments, and invoices together.
  • want features such as recurring invoices, multiple companies, or a customer invoice portal.
  • need companion Android or iOS apps for invoicing workflows.
Read the crater analysis →

Choose FOSSBilling if you…

  • run a hosting or other online service business and want centralized client and billing management.
  • need an extension-friendly system for custom integrations or features.
  • are prepared to self-host a beta project in a LAMP or LEMP environment.
Read the FOSSBilling analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.