shoreguard vs CubeSandbox
AI-agent sandbox management compared
shoreguard is a management plane for NVIDIA OpenShell, providing tools to manage sandboxes, policies, gateways, and inference routing. CubeSandbox runs workloads inside KVM-based microVMs; the main difference is that shoreguard manages OpenShell environments, while CubeSandbox provides the sandbox execution service.
shoreguard: Manage NVIDIA OpenShell Agent Sandboxes
ShoreGuard adds a web UI, REST API, and Terraform workflow for managing NVIDIA OpenShell sandboxes, policies, and routed inference. It suits teams operating multiple gateways that need centralized access controls and auditability.
CubeSandbox: Run Secure, Fast Sandboxes for AI Agents
CubeSandbox is a self-hostable sandbox service for running untrusted AI-agent workloads in hardware-isolated microVMs. It combines E2B SDK compatibility with snapshots, network controls, and single-node or multi-node deployment.
| shoreguard | CubeSandbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Python | Go |
| License | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Stars | 4 | 12.8k |
| Forks | 2 | 1.2k |
| Last analyzed | Oct 8, 2026 | Oct 3, 2026 |
Key differences
- shoreguard focuses on managing sandboxes and policies across OpenShell gateways; CubeSandbox focuses on isolated code execution in microVMs.
- shoreguard is written in Python and requires Python 3.14 or newer; CubeSandbox is written in Go and requires Linux with KVM.
- shoreguard offers a web interface, REST API, and Terraform workflow; CubeSandbox offers REST APIs compatible with the E2B SDK interface.
- shoreguard supports policy revision history, approval workflows, audit logs, and YAML-based GitOps; CubeSandbox provides snapshots, cloning, rollback, and idle pause and resume.
- shoreguard is licensed Apache-2.0; CubeSandbox metadata reports NOASSERTION, while its README states Apache License 2.0.
- shoreguard is aimed at teams operating OpenShell gateways; CubeSandbox is aimed at teams operating self-hosted sandbox infrastructure for agent workloads.
Choose shoreguard if you…
- need centralized management of multiple NVIDIA OpenShell gateways and their policies.
- want approval workflows, policy history, and auditability for sandbox changes.
- plan to manage policies through Terraform or version-controlled YAML workflows.
Choose CubeSandbox if you…
- need to run untrusted workloads in KVM-based microVMs rather than manage OpenShell sandboxes.
- want E2B SDK-compatible APIs with snapshots, cloning, and rollback.
- can operate Linux and KVM infrastructure for a self-hosted sandbox service.
Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects
This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.