gentle-ai vs cq
Memory and shared learning for coding agents compared
gentle-ai and cq help coding agents reuse knowledge across sessions. gentle-ai configures existing agents with persistent project memory, workflows and review evidence, while cq provides a store where agents can query and contribute reusable lessons.

gentle-ai: Add Memory and Workflows to Coding Agents
Gentle-AI configures existing AI coding agents with persistent memory, development workflows and evidence-based review, without locking you into one agent. It supports 17 agents across macOS, Linux and Windows.

cq: Share Collective Learning Between AI Agents
cq is a knowledge store and workflow for coding agents to query, contribute, and validate reusable lessons. It helps teams and individual developers avoid repeating debugging work across agent sessions and machines.
| gentle-ai | cq | |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Go | Go |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 7.9k | 1.3k |
| Forks | 845 | 69 |
| Last analyzed | Oct 19, 2026 | Oct 3, 2026 |
Key differences
- gentle-ai adds memory, development workflows and review evidence to agents; cq focuses on querying, proposing and validating reusable knowledge units.
- gentle-ai configures 17 agent integrations through their native settings; cq offers installations for seven named agent hosts and provides MCP tools, SDKs and a server image.
- gentle-ai is designed for local agent configuration across macOS, Linux and Windows; cq supports local SQLite storage, a hosted service or a self-hosted server.
- gentle-ai is licensed under MIT; cq is licensed under Apache-2.0.
- cq is in 0.x and warns that breaking changes are expected; gentle-ai describes ongoing development and notes that integration capabilities vary.
Choose gentle-ai if you…
- want persistent project context alongside workflows and evidence-based review.
- need to configure existing agents across macOS, Linux or Windows without replacing them.
- prefer a shared workflow for a team using different coding agents.
Choose cq if you…
- want agents to query and contribute reusable lessons about recurring problems.
- need a knowledge store that can be local, hosted or self-hosted for team sharing.
- want MCP tools, Go and Python SDKs, or a server component for integrating knowledge workflows.
Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects
This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.