gentle-ai vs cq

Memory and shared learning for coding agents compared

gentle-ai and cq help coding agents reuse knowledge across sessions. gentle-ai configures existing agents with persistent project memory, workflows and review evidence, while cq provides a store where agents can query and contribute reusable lessons.

gentle-aicq
LanguageGoGo
LicenseMITApache-2.0
Stars7.9k1.3k
Forks84569
Last analyzedOct 19, 2026Oct 3, 2026

Key differences

  • gentle-ai adds memory, development workflows and review evidence to agents; cq focuses on querying, proposing and validating reusable knowledge units.
  • gentle-ai configures 17 agent integrations through their native settings; cq offers installations for seven named agent hosts and provides MCP tools, SDKs and a server image.
  • gentle-ai is designed for local agent configuration across macOS, Linux and Windows; cq supports local SQLite storage, a hosted service or a self-hosted server.
  • gentle-ai is licensed under MIT; cq is licensed under Apache-2.0.
  • cq is in 0.x and warns that breaking changes are expected; gentle-ai describes ongoing development and notes that integration capabilities vary.

Choose gentle-ai if you…

  • want persistent project context alongside workflows and evidence-based review.
  • need to configure existing agents across macOS, Linux or Windows without replacing them.
  • prefer a shared workflow for a team using different coding agents.
Read the gentle-ai analysis →

Choose cq if you…

  • want agents to query and contribute reusable lessons about recurring problems.
  • need a knowledge store that can be local, hosted or self-hosted for team sharing.
  • want MCP tools, Go and Python SDKs, or a server component for integrating knowledge workflows.
Read the cq analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.