elephant-goldfish-model vs get-shit-done

AI-assisted specification workflows compared

elephant-goldfish-model and get-shit-done both use specifications to structure software development with coding agents. elephant-goldfish-model focuses on project-informed design and independent review across several documented environments, while get-shit-done centers on spec-driven development with Claude Code and is archived in favor of GSD Core.

elephant-goldfish-modelget-shit-done
LanguagePythonJavaScript
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
Stars8.8k64.2k
Forks5545.4k
Last analyzedNov 1, 2026Oct 29, 2026

Key differences

  • elephant-goldfish-model supports Antigravity, Claude Code, Codex, and other documented environments; get-shit-done is designed for Claude Code.
  • elephant-goldfish-model drafts specifications from project context and uses fresh subagents to review designs; get-shit-done emphasizes meta-prompting and context engineering for spec-driven work.
  • elephant-goldfish-model also supports documentation bootstrapping and checking for drift between documents and source code; get-shit-done's listed focus is guiding development through specifications and context.
  • elephant-goldfish-model is written in Python and uses the Apache-2.0 license; get-shit-done is written in JavaScript and uses the MIT license.
  • elephant-goldfish-model is not archived; get-shit-done is archived and read-only, with current development directed to GSD Core in the Open GSD repository.

Choose elephant-goldfish-model if you…

  • need design specifications grounded in project context and fresh-agent reviews.
  • want workflows for brainstorming, design review, or checking documentation against source code.
  • use Antigravity, Claude Code, Codex, or another documented coding-agent environment.
Read the elephant-goldfish-model analysis →

Choose get-shit-done if you…

  • want a Claude Code-focused workflow built around meta-prompting and context engineering.
  • are evaluating its specification-led approach before adopting GSD Core.
  • need to consult the archived repository rather than an active development home.
Read the get-shit-done analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.