namviek vs plane

Project management tools for teams, compared

namviek and plane both help teams manage project work and can be self-hosted. namviek focuses on core project management for small development teams, while plane offers a broader set of issue tracking, planning, documentation, and analytics tools, as well as a hosted option.

namviekplane
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
Stars2.6k60.3k
Forks3036k
Last analyzedOct 29, 2026Oct 3, 2026

Key differences

  • namviek targets small development teams and core project management; plane covers work items, cycles, modules, saved views, Pages, and analytics.
  • namviek uses a Next.js frontend with Node.js, MongoDB, and Redis; plane describes a React Router and Django-based application, with Node.js also listed among its technologies.
  • namviek documents Docker setup and deployment options for Vercel and Render; plane offers Plane Cloud and self-hosting guides for Docker Compose or Kubernetes.
  • namviek is licensed under GPL-3.0; plane is licensed under AGPL-3.0.
  • The listed repositories have different levels of community activity: namviek has 2.6k stars and 301 forks, while plane has 60.3k stars and 6k forks.

Choose namviek if you…

  • need core project management aimed at a small development team.
  • want to self-host and manage hosting costs instead of paying per seat.
  • plan to use its documented Docker setup and MongoDB and Redis services.
Read the namviek analysis →

Choose plane if you…

  • need issue tracking alongside cycles, modules, saved views, Pages, and analytics.
  • want a choice between Plane Cloud and self-hosting with Docker Compose or Kubernetes.
  • are evaluating a Jira- or Linear-style workflow for product and delivery work.
Read the plane analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.