lighteval vs weave

Language model evaluation and application tracing compared

lighteval evaluates language models across tasks and supported inference backends, with sample-level results and options for custom tasks and metrics. weave focuses on tracing generative AI application calls and organizing evaluations across experimentation and production.

lightevalweave
LanguagePythonPython
LicenseMITApache-2.0
Stars2.5k1.1k
Forks566171
Last analyzedOct 3, 2026Oct 3, 2026

Key differences

  • lighteval provides a catalog of more than 1,000 evaluation tasks across domains and languages, while weave emphasizes tracing application execution and structured evaluations.
  • lighteval supports evaluation through backends including Accelerate, Nanotron, vLLM, SGLang, and inference endpoints; weave integrates tracing into Python code with the `weave.op` decorator.
  • lighteval reports an MIT license, while weave reports Apache-2.0.
  • lighteval lists Windows as untested and unsupported; weave requires Python 3.10 or higher and a Weights & Biases account.
  • lighteval lists 2.5k stars and 566 forks, while weave lists 1.1k stars and 171 forks.
  • weave says work on its engine and boards is paused during a focus on tracing and evaluations; lighteval notes 429 open issues.

Choose lighteval if you…

  • need to compare models across established tasks and supported inference backends.
  • want to inspect individual evaluation samples or define custom tasks and metrics.
  • work with multilingual or domain-specific evaluations represented in its task catalog.
Read the lighteval analysis →

Choose weave if you…

  • need to trace inputs, outputs, and nested function calls in an AI application.
  • want to compare model or prompt changes through structured evaluations.
  • track workflows that combine model calls with validation and data transformations.
Read the weave analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.