Wake vs atlas

Coding-agent session workspaces compared

Wake and atlas are Rust desktop apps that help developers work with coding-agent sessions and carry project context forward. Wake focuses on searching and resuming histories gathered from local agent data, while atlas connects agent work to Git commits in a broader project workspace.

Wakeatlas
LanguageRustRust
LicenseMITApache-2.0
Stars1.5k8.9k
Forks96350
Last analyzedOct 18, 2026Oct 4, 2026

Key differences

  • Wake is centered on indexing, searching, reading, and resuming past sessions; atlas combines agent runs with Git, notes, an editor, terminal, and project context.
  • Wake reads agent data locally and read-only, with optional plugins, MCP, and CLI access; atlas captures sessions locally and offers optional account-based sync.
  • Wake is macOS-first, with experimental Linux and Windows support; atlas supports macOS 13+ and Windows 10+ and describes Linux builds as untested.
  • Wake uses the MIT license; atlas uses Apache-2.0.
  • Wake is less than six months old and has frequent releases, with most code from one person; atlas's provided considerations focus on ongoing QA for ACP registry agents and its analytics defaults.

Choose Wake if you…

  • need a searchable view of session histories across supported coding agents.
  • want to browse transcripts and resume work in the relevant project and terminal.
  • need to search locally read agent data or mirror sessions from remote machines.
Read the Wake analysis →

Choose atlas if you…

  • want to connect agent sessions, prompts, and tool calls to Git commits.
  • need a shared project context across agents, including notes, plans, and prior sessions.
  • want a desktop workspace combining agent runs with Git tools, an editor, a terminal, and research tools.
Read the atlas analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.