Amethyst vs yabai

macOS window managers compared

Amethyst and yabai automatically tile macOS windows and support keyboard-driven workflows. Amethyst offers selectable layouts and GUI or YAML configuration, while yabai centers on command-line control and binary space partitioning.

Amethystyabai
LanguageSwiftC
LicenseMITMIT
Stars16.3k29.7k
Forks536777
Last analyzedOct 3, 2026Oct 3, 2026

Key differences

  • Amethyst offers several selectable layouts, including Tall, Column, Fullscreen, and Floating; yabai tiles using binary space partitioning.
  • Amethyst provides shortcuts and GUI or YAML settings; yabai provides command-line controls, with shortcuts set up through optional third-party software.
  • Amethyst is written in Swift, while yabai is written in C. Both use the MIT license.
  • Amethyst supports custom JavaScript layouts, described as beta; yabai includes focus-follows-mouse behavior and can disable space-switching animations.
  • Some advanced yabai features require partially disabling System Integrity Protection; Amethyst requires Accessibility permission to control windows.
  • Amethyst lists 16.3k stars and yabai lists 29.7k stars. Both are unarchived.

Choose Amethyst if you…

  • want a choice of structured layouts, including a floating option
  • prefer GUI or YAML configuration and built-in window-management shortcuts
  • want custom JavaScript layouts, with beta status in mind
Read the Amethyst analysis →

Choose yabai if you…

  • want command-line control over windows, spaces, and displays
  • need focus-follows-mouse behavior or the option to disable space-switching animations
  • are comfortable configuring permissions and considering optional System Integrity Protection changes for advanced features
Read the yabai analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.