jitsi-meet vs mirotalk
Browser-based video conferencing compared
jitsi-meet and mirotalk both provide browser-based video meetings and options to self-host. jitsi-meet also offers hosted meetings, mobile apps, and web and native SDKs, while mirotalk focuses on self-hosted peer-to-peer WebRTC rooms with collaboration and integration features.

jitsi-meet: Host and Embed Video Conferences
Jitsi Meet is a browser-based video conferencing platform with mobile apps and SDKs for integration. Use the hosted service for quick meetings or deploy your own instance when you need control over branding and operations.

mirotalk: Self-Host Peer-to-Peer Video Meetings
MiroTalk P2P is a self-hosted browser-based video conferencing app built on WebRTC peer-to-peer connections. It suits teams and communities that want control over meeting data, with chat, screen sharing, recording, and collaboration features.
| jitsi-meet | mirotalk | |
|---|---|---|
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Stars | 30k | 4.8k |
| Forks | 8.1k | 778 |
| Last analyzed | Oct 3, 2026 | Oct 4, 2026 |
Key differences
- jitsi-meet supports hosted meetings as well as self-managed deployments; mirotalk is intended for teams that host their own service.
- jitsi-meet offers Android and iOS apps and web and native SDKs; mirotalk offers iframe and widget embedding options.
- mirotalk uses peer-to-peer WebRTC connections and lists features such as recording, file sharing, and a collaborative whiteboard; jitsi-meet lists polls, hand raising, reactions, and virtual backgrounds.
- jitsi-meet is written in TypeScript and licensed under Apache-2.0; mirotalk is written in JavaScript and licensed under AGPL-3.0.
- jitsi-meet offers Debian packages and Docker setup; mirotalk offers Node.js and Docker deployment paths.
Choose jitsi-meet if you…
- need a hosted meeting option as well as self-hosting.
- want Android or iOS apps, or web and native SDKs for integration.
- prefer an Apache-2.0 licensed project.
Choose mirotalk if you…
- want to host peer-to-peer WebRTC meeting rooms on infrastructure you manage.
- need features such as recording, file sharing, a whiteboard, or REST API integrations.
- want Node.js deployment or iframe and widget embedding options.
This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.