jitsi-meet vs mirotalksfu
Video conferencing compared: jitsi-meet and mirotalksfu
jitsi-meet and mirotalksfu both provide video conferencing for teams, developers, and organizations. jitsi-meet offers a hosted service alongside self-hosting, while mirotalksfu is designed to run on infrastructure you manage and adds collaboration and RTMP streaming features.
jitsi-meet: Host and Embed Video Conferences
Jitsi Meet is a browser-based video conferencing platform with mobile apps and SDKs for integration. Use the hosted service for meetings or deploy your own instance when you need control over branding and infrastructure.
mirotalksfu: Self-Host WebRTC Video Conferencing with Mediasoup
MiroTalk SFU is a self-hosted WebRTC video conferencing platform built on mediasoup for real-time communication and collaboration. It offers a deployable alternative to hosted meeting services, with options for Docker or Node.js.
| jitsi-meet | mirotalksfu | |
|---|---|---|
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Stars | 30.1k | 3.1k |
| Forks | 8.1k | 520 |
| Last analyzed | Oct 6, 2026 | Oct 24, 2026 |
Key differences
- jitsi-meet is written in TypeScript; mirotalksfu is written in JavaScript.
- jitsi-meet is licensed under Apache-2.0; mirotalksfu uses AGPL-3.0, which has conditions for modified versions.
- jitsi-meet offers meetings through meet.jit.si as well as self-hosting; mirotalksfu is self-hosted and requires server administration.
- jitsi-meet highlights Android and iOS apps, native and web SDKs, and meeting features such as polls and reactions; mirotalksfu highlights a whiteboard, file sharing, room access controls, and RTMP streaming.
- Both support Docker deployment, while jitsi-meet also offers Debian packages and mirotalksfu also documents deployment with Node.js.
- The provided project data lists 30k stars and 8.1k forks for jitsi-meet, compared with 3.1k stars and 512 forks for mirotalksfu.
Choose jitsi-meet if you…
- need a hosted meeting option as well as the choice to self-host.
- want Android or iOS apps, or web and native SDKs for integration.
- prefer Apache-2.0 licensing or deployment options that include Debian packages.
Choose mirotalksfu if you…
- want to run the conferencing service on infrastructure you manage.
- need RTMP streaming alongside meetings, or collaboration tools such as file sharing and a whiteboard.
- want access controls including passwords, a lobby, JWT credentials, or OIDC authentication.
Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects
This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.