Dockge vs arcane

Self-hosted Docker management interfaces compared

Dockge and arcane are self-hosted web interfaces for working with Docker. Dockge centers on Compose stack workflows and keeping stack files on disk, while arcane covers Docker management with a container-management focus alongside Compose projects.

Dockgearcane
LanguageTypeScriptGo
LicenseMITBSD-3-Clause
Stars24.8k7.7k
Forks865323
Last analyzedNov 7, 2026Oct 3, 2026

Key differences

  • Dockge focuses on creating, editing, deploying, and monitoring Compose stacks; arcane emphasizes container management as well as Compose-related workflows.
  • Dockge keeps Compose files in a host directory for access outside the UI and use with standard Docker Compose commands.
  • Dockge lists support for Docker or Podman and multi-host stack management through agents; arcane’s supplied details describe Docker management without listing deployment requirements.
  • Dockge is written in TypeScript and uses the MIT license; arcane is written in Go and uses the BSD-3-Clause license.
  • Dockge lists 24.5k stars and 837 forks; arcane lists 7.7k stars and 323 forks.

Choose Dockge if you…

  • want a web UI centered on Compose stack editing and operations.
  • need live deployment progress and interactive terminal output.
  • want stack files to remain accessible on disk and usable with standard Docker Compose commands.
Read the Dockge analysis →

Choose arcane if you…

  • want a visual interface for container management as well as Compose projects.
  • prefer a Docker management UI alongside command-line tools.
  • want to contribute interface translations through the linked Crowdin project.
Read the arcane analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.