markitdown vs mammoth.js

Document conversion tools compared

markitdown converts a range of document and media formats into Markdown for text-analysis workflows. mammoth.js converts DOCX files into semantic HTML for JavaScript applications; both favor readable structure over visual fidelity.

markitdownmammoth.js
LanguagePythonJavaScript
LicenseMITBSD-2-Clause
Stars188k6.3k
Forks13.9k672
Last analyzedOct 4, 2026Oct 8, 2026

Key differences

  • markitdown handles formats including PDF, Office files, HTML, images, audio, EPUB, ZIP, and YouTube URLs, while mammoth.js focuses on DOCX.
  • markitdown outputs Markdown, while mammoth.js outputs HTML and also offers plain-text extraction.
  • markitdown is a Python library with a command-line interface; mammoth.js is a JavaScript library for Node.js and browsers, also with a command-line interface.
  • markitdown is licensed under MIT, while mammoth.js uses BSD-2-Clause.
  • markitdown supports optional format dependencies, plugins, and Azure extraction integrations; mammoth.js offers configurable style maps and custom image handling.
  • The projects differ in scale in the supplied figures: markitdown has 188k stars and 13.9k forks, while mammoth.js has 6.3k stars and 672 forks.

Choose markitdown if you…

  • need Markdown conversion across a range of document and media formats.
  • want a Python API or command-line workflow for text-analysis pipelines.
  • need optional format dependencies, plugins, or Azure-based extraction integrations.
Read the markitdown analysis →

Choose mammoth.js if you…

  • need to convert DOCX files into semantic HTML in Node.js or a browser.
  • want configurable mappings from Word styles to HTML.
  • need plain-text extraction or custom handling for images in DOCX documents.
Read the mammoth.js analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.