mirotalk vs mirotalksfu
Self-hosted video conferencing compared
mirotalk and mirotalksfu are JavaScript projects for hosting browser-based WebRTC meetings on infrastructure you manage. mirotalk uses peer-to-peer connections, while mirotalksfu uses mediasoup SFU architecture and also highlights RTMP streaming workflows.
mirotalk: Self-Host Peer-to-Peer Video Meetings
MiroTalk P2P is a self-hosted browser video-conferencing app built on WebRTC, with meeting tools such as screen sharing, chat, and whiteboards. It suits teams that want to run their own meeting service and can manage a Node.js or Docker deployment.
mirotalksfu: Host WebRTC Video Conferences on Your Server
MiroTalk SFU is a self-hosted video conferencing platform built on mediasoup for meetings, collaboration, and streaming. It suits teams that want control of their conferencing infrastructure and can operate a Node.js server.
| mirotalk | mirotalksfu | |
|---|---|---|
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Stars | 4.8k | 3.1k |
| Forks | 783 | 514 |
| Last analyzed | Oct 14, 2026 | Oct 12, 2026 |
Key differences
- mirotalk connects participants peer to peer, while mirotalksfu coordinates audio and video through a mediasoup SFU.
- mirotalk offers Markdown and emoji chat; mirotalksfu adds a rich text editor and lists file sharing among its collaboration features.
- mirotalksfu supports RTMP output, including OBS workflows, for streaming alongside meetings.
- mirotalk lists host protection options and Slack and Mattermost integrations; mirotalksfu lists lobby access controls and Slack, Discord, and Mattermost integrations.
- Both use JavaScript, are licensed under AGPL-3.0, are not archived, and support Node.js or Docker deployment.
- The supplied repository figures list mirotalk at 4.8k stars and 778 forks, and mirotalksfu at 3.1k stars and 512 forks.
Choose mirotalk if you…
- want peer-to-peer WebRTC meetings rather than an SFU architecture.
- need Markdown and emoji chat, or want to use its listed host protection options.
- plan to embed meetings and prefer its listed Slack and Mattermost integrations.
Choose mirotalksfu if you…
- need mediasoup SFU architecture for conferencing.
- want RTMP output, including OBS workflows, alongside meetings.
- need a rich text editor, lobby access controls, or Discord integration.
Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects
This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.