motion vs theatre

Web animation libraries compared

motion and theatre are TypeScript libraries for animating web experiences. motion focuses on framework APIs and interaction patterns such as gestures, springs, and layout transitions, while theatre combines code with a visual editor for detailed choreography across 3D, HTML, SVG, and JavaScript values.

motiontheatre
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
LicenseMITApache-2.0
Stars33.8k12.7k
Forks1.4k478
Last analyzedOct 3, 2026Oct 3, 2026

Key differences

  • motion provides APIs for JavaScript, React, and Vue; theatre supports animation through React or other libraries and can animate arbitrary JavaScript values.
  • motion emphasizes gestures, spring animations, layout transitions, and scroll-linked effects; theatre emphasizes visual editing, precise timing, and choreographed sequences.
  • theatre includes a visual editor alongside its code library; motion describes declarative and JavaScript animation APIs and timelines.
  • motion is MIT licensed; theatre uses Apache 2.0 for core and most packages, while its studio package uses AGPL 3.0.
  • theatre's development has temporarily moved to a private repository as its team works toward version 1.0; motion is not described as archived.

Choose motion if you…

  • need animation APIs for JavaScript, React, or Vue.
  • want gestures, springs, layout transitions, or scroll-linked effects.
  • prefer a core library described as MIT licensed.
Read the motion analysis →

Choose theatre if you…

  • want to design and edit animations with a visual editor as well as code.
  • need to choreograph 3D scenes or animate HTML, SVG, and JavaScript values.
  • are building detailed motion graphics, generative visuals, or interactive art.
Read the theatre analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.