agent.cpp vs harness-sdk

Local C++ agents compared with Python and TypeScript agent tooling

agent.cpp builds local AI agents in C++ using llama.cpp and GGUF models. harness-sdk provides Python and TypeScript harnesses and SDKs, with support for multiple model providers and options ranging from ready-made defaults to custom agent loops.

agent.cppharness-sdk
LanguageC++Python
LicenseMITApache-2.0
Stars2108.6k
Forks311.3k
Last analyzedOct 3, 2026Oct 3, 2026

Key differences

  • agent.cpp is a C++ library focused on local inference through llama.cpp; harness-sdk is a Python and TypeScript monorepo with harnesses and lower-level SDKs.
  • agent.cpp uses GGUF models and supports GBNF grammar constraints and LoRA adapters; harness-sdk documents providers including Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, OpenAI, and Gemini.
  • agent.cpp centers on an agent loop, tools, and lifecycle callbacks; harness-sdk also offers configurable harness defaults, execution limits, sessions, streaming, hooks, tracing, and evaluation support.
  • agent.cpp is licensed under MIT, while harness-sdk is licensed under Apache-2.0.
  • The listed project sizes differ: agent.cpp has 210 stars and 31 forks, while harness-sdk has 8.6k stars and 1.3k forks.

Choose agent.cpp if you…

  • need to run GGUF models locally through llama.cpp in a C++ application.
  • want to customize tool execution or agent lifecycle behavior with callbacks.
  • need grammar constraints or LoRA adapter support for a local agent.
Read the agent.cpp analysis →

Choose harness-sdk if you…

  • want a ready-made Python or TypeScript harness with configurable defaults.
  • need to choose among documented model providers or connect tools through MCP.
  • want execution controls such as turn limits, token budgets, cancellation, or tracing.
Read the harness-sdk analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.