n8n-sandbox-service vs CubeSandbox

Self-hosted sandbox services compared

n8n-sandbox-service and CubeSandbox both provide APIs for running work in isolated environments. n8n-sandbox-service centers on placing sandboxes across registered runners, while CubeSandbox focuses on KVM microVMs for AI-agent and other workloads, with additional state and network controls.

n8n-sandbox-serviceCubeSandbox
LanguageGoGo
License—NOASSERTION
Stars2912.8k
Forks131.2k
Last analyzedOct 23, 2026Oct 3, 2026

Key differences

  • n8n-sandbox-service supports containers or Firecracker microVMs; CubeSandbox runs each sandbox in a KVM-based microVM with a dedicated OS kernel.
  • n8n-sandbox-service registers runners with a central API that places sandboxes and proxies requests; CubeSandbox describes single-node and multi-node deployment with centralized scheduling.
  • n8n-sandbox-service provides a REST API and TypeScript SDK; CubeSandbox provides REST APIs compatible with the E2B SDK interface.
  • CubeSandbox lists snapshots, cloning, rollback, network isolation, egress controls, and automatic pause and resume; n8n-sandbox-service focuses on command execution and file handling through a sandbox daemon.
  • n8n-sandbox-service has setup paths for Sysbox on Linux, Firecracker on KVM, macOS development, and Kubernetes; CubeSandbox requires Linux and KVM, and identifies Kubernetes deployment as preview.
  • Both report Go and NOASSERTION in the supplied metadata. Their README license details differ: n8n-sandbox-service identifies a Sustainable Use License and an n8n Enterprise License for `.ee` files or directories, while CubeSandbox states Apache License 2.0.

Choose n8n-sandbox-service if you…

  • need a central API to place sandboxes across registered runners.
  • want to run commands and manage files through an HTTP daemon inside each sandbox.
  • need setup paths covering containers or Firecracker microVMs, with macOS development guidance.
Read the n8n-sandbox-service analysis →

Choose CubeSandbox if you…

  • need KVM microVM isolation for AI-agent or other untrusted workloads.
  • want E2B SDK-compatible REST interfaces or features such as snapshots, cloning, and rollback.
  • can operate Linux and KVM infrastructure and want single-node or multi-node deployment options.
Read the CubeSandbox analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.