goose vs opencode

AI agents for coding and broader workflows compared

goose and opencode are open source AI agents that can take actions to assist with software work. goose supports coding and wider workflows through a desktop app, CLI, and API, while opencode focuses on coding with build and read-only plan agents in a terminal UI and a beta desktop app.

gooseopencode
LanguageRustTypeScript
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
Stars54.9k212k
Forks6.4k28.1k
Last analyzedOct 3, 2026Oct 3, 2026

Key differences

  • goose is written in Rust and licensed under Apache-2.0; opencode is written in TypeScript and licensed under MIT.
  • goose targets coding, research, writing, automation, and data analysis, while opencode is focused on software development.
  • goose connects to multiple model providers and MCP extensions; opencode describes build, plan, and general subagents for coding tasks.
  • goose offers a desktop app, CLI, and API; opencode offers a terminal UI and a desktop app in beta.
  • goose's desktop installations support macOS, Linux, and Windows; opencode's beta desktop app supports the same three platforms.

Choose goose if you…

  • want an agent for coding as well as research, writing, automation, or data analysis.
  • need a choice of desktop app, CLI, or API, with connections to multiple model providers and MCP extensions.
  • want to connect existing Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini subscriptions through ACP.
Read the goose analysis →

Choose opencode if you…

  • want an agent focused on software development, with separate build and read-only plan agents.
  • prefer a terminal UI and installation options such as npm, Homebrew, Scoop, or an install script.
  • want to explore code with the plan agent before making changes, or try a beta desktop app.
Read the opencode analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.