maka vs synara
Agent workspaces compared: maka and synara
maka and synara are TypeScript desktop workspaces for working with AI agents. maka focuses on a shared runtime and traceable execution records, while synara brings coding-agent sessions together with project files, terminals, previews, and Git review.
maka: Keep a Complete Record of AI Agent Work
Apache Maka is a high-performance agent workspace that records every model message, tool call, permission decision, and turn ending. It runs as a desktop app, with TUI and CLI clients, on macOS and preview builds for Windows and Linux.
synara: Manage Coding Agents in a Desktop Workspace
Synara is a local-first desktop workspace for coordinating coding-agent sessions with project files, terminals, previews, and Git review. It suits developers who want to run locally installed agent providers and keep execution and review in one place.
| maka | synara | |
|---|---|---|
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Stars | 5.8k | 2k |
| Forks | 557 | 310 |
| Last analyzed | Oct 19, 2026 | Oct 3, 2026 |
Key differences
- maka records model messages, tool calls, and permission decisions in an append-only runtime log; synara organizes coding-agent work into projects and task threads.
- maka uses one Runtime Host across its desktop, TUI, and CLI clients; synara centers on a desktop workspace with integrated terminals, file tools, previews, and Git workflows.
- maka connects to user-provided cloud APIs, local models, or compatible gateways; synara uses locally installed and authenticated coding-agent runtimes.
- maka's desktop runs on macOS, with Windows and Linux marked as previews; synara lists native release targets for Windows x64, macOS Intel and Apple Silicon, and Linux x64.
- maka is licensed under Apache-2.0 and is an Apache incubating project; synara is licensed under MIT. Both describe themselves as early-stage or changing software.
- maka includes evaluation tooling and per-task reports; synara emphasizes managed worktrees, provider handoffs, and reviewing changes in the workspace.
Choose maka if you…
- want an append-only record of agent messages, tool calls, and permission decisions.
- need desktop, TUI, and CLI access backed by a shared runtime.
- plan to connect your own model and use evaluation tooling to compare agent runs.
Choose synara if you…
- want to coordinate coding-agent sessions across projects and providers.
- need terminals, file tools, previews, and Git review alongside agent conversations.
- want managed worktrees for parallel tasks or provider handoffs.
Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects
This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.