atomic-crm vs twenty
Customizable CRMs compared: atomic-crm and twenty
atomic-crm and twenty are TypeScript CRM projects for organizing business records and adapting workflows. atomic-crm centers on contacts, follow-ups, notes, and a sales pipeline, while twenty emphasizes configurable data models and code-defined customizations, with both cloud and self-hosted options.
atomic-crm: Manage Contacts, Tasks, and Sales Deals
Atomic CRM is a customizable, self-hostable CRM built with React and Supabase. It helps teams organize contacts, follow-ups, notes, and sales deals, with options to extend the app and integrate it with other systems.
twenty: Customize and Self-Host a CRM
Twenty is a TypeScript CRM for teams that need customizable business workflows and data models. Use it as a cloud service, self-host it, or extend it with apps defined and versioned as code.
| atomic-crm | twenty | |
|---|---|---|
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| License | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Stars | 1.3k | 57.9k |
| Forks | 834 | 9.4k |
| Last analyzed | Oct 3, 2026 | Oct 3, 2026 |
Key differences
- atomic-crm includes contact import and export, follow-up tasks, email notes, a Kanban deal pipeline, and activity logs; twenty provides objects, fields, views, workflows, and agents.
- atomic-crm supports customization through custom fields, themes, replaceable components, and an API; twenty lets teams define objects, fields, and views as code and publish apps to a workspace.
- atomic-crm is available as a self-hosted app and online demo, with a local setup involving Docker-managed Supabase and Postgres; twenty offers cloud access and self-hosting through Docker Compose.
- atomic-crm is licensed MIT; twenty reports its license as NOASSERTION, so its current licensing details should be checked before adoption.
- atomic-crm highlights sales teams, consultants, and organizations adapting a CRM through forks; twenty is oriented toward technical teams comfortable modeling workflows and managing customizations as code.
- Both projects use TypeScript. Their reported GitHub stars are 1.3k for atomic-crm and 57.9k for twenty.
Choose atomic-crm if you…
- need contact management with follow-ups, notes, deal tracking, and interaction history in one app.
- want to customize a CRM through fields, themes, components, or an API.
- prefer an MIT-licensed project and can manage its local Supabase and Postgres setup.
Choose twenty if you…
- want to model CRM data and workflows with objects, fields, views, workflows, and agents.
- prefer to define and version CRM customizations as code, then publish them to a workspace.
- want the option of a hosted service as well as Docker Compose self-hosting.
Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects
This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.