firecrawl vs deepscrape

Web scraping and crawling projects compared

firecrawl and deepscrape turn website content into formats useful for applications, data pipelines, and AI workflows. firecrawl offers a hosted API as well as self-hosting, while deepscrape is a self-hosted service with HTTP and Playwright scraping paths.

firecrawldeepscrape
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
Stars188k320
Forks10k26
Last analyzedOct 3, 2026Oct 3, 2026

Key differences

  • firecrawl supports web search and website mapping in addition to scraping and crawling; deepscrape focuses on scraping, crawling, and extraction.
  • firecrawl provides a hosted service and can also be self-hosted; deepscrape is self-hosted and may require Redis and Playwright browser dependencies.
  • firecrawl is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while deepscrape is licensed under MIT.
  • firecrawl supports structured JSON extraction and browser actions; deepscrape offers CSS-selector extraction or optional schema-based LLM extraction.
  • firecrawl reports 188k stars and 10k forks; deepscrape reports 320 stars and 26 forks.

Choose firecrawl if you…

  • need web search or website URL mapping alongside scraping and crawling.
  • want a hosted API option, or an AGPL-3.0 codebase that can be self-hosted.
  • need SDK access across languages including Python, TypeScript, Go, Java, or Rust.
Read the firecrawl analysis →

Choose deepscrape if you…

  • want a self-hosted TypeScript service with an MIT license.
  • need to choose between HTTP fetching and Playwright for different page types.
  • want CSS-selector extraction, optional schema-based LLM extraction, or background jobs using BullMQ and Redis.
Read the deepscrape analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.