mcp-gateway vs mcpo

MCP gateways compared: centralized routing or OpenAPI access

mcp-gateway and mcpo both make MCP server tools accessible through a shared interface. mcp-gateway combines MCP and REST capabilities behind one endpoint with on-demand tool discovery, while mcpo exposes MCP tools as HTTP APIs documented with OpenAPI.

mcp-gatewaymcpo
LanguageRustPython
LicenseNOASSERTIONMIT
Stars784.4k
Forks19497
Last analyzedOct 3, 2026Oct 3, 2026

Key differences

  • mcp-gateway aggregates MCP servers and REST API capabilities; mcpo wraps tools from MCP servers as HTTP endpoints.
  • mcp-gateway offers meta-tools for searching and invoking tools on demand; mcpo provides generated OpenAPI schemas and interactive documentation.
  • mcp-gateway is written in Rust, while mcpo is written in Python and requires Python 3.8 or newer.
  • mcp-gateway lists its license as NOASSERTION and describes commercial use as requiring a commercial license; mcpo uses the MIT license.
  • mcp-gateway supports stdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE, and WebSocket transports; mcpo supports command-launched servers, SSE, and Streamable HTTP connections.
  • mcp-gateway reports 78 stars and 19 forks; mcpo reports 4.4k stars and 497 forks.

Choose mcp-gateway if you…

  • need one endpoint for MCP servers and REST APIs.
  • want on-demand tool discovery and centralized routing or policy controls.
  • need a gateway that bridges supported MCP protocol revisions.
Read the mcp-gateway analysis →

Choose mcpo if you…

  • want MCP tools exposed as HTTP APIs with generated OpenAPI schemas and interactive docs.
  • need to connect MCP tools to an OpenAPI-based application or UI.
  • want a Python proxy that can serve multiple configured MCP servers, with optional hot reload.
Read the mcpo analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.