meeting-transcriber vs meetily

Local meeting transcription and summaries compared

meeting-transcriber and meetily record meetings, transcribe audio locally, and support meeting summaries. meeting-transcriber is a macOS menu bar app with separate app and microphone tracks, while meetily is a desktop app with real-time transcription and platform-specific GPU acceleration.

meeting-transcribermeetily
LanguageSwiftRust
LicenseMITMIT
Stars22231.6k
Forks723.5k
Last analyzedOct 29, 2026Oct 10, 2026

Key differences

  • meeting-transcriber is written in Swift for macOS 14.2 or later; meetily uses a Rust backend with a Next.js interface and supports macOS and Windows, while Linux users build from source.
  • meeting-transcriber detects Teams, Zoom, and Webex calls and records app audio separately from microphone input; meetily captures microphone and system audio together with audio mixing.
  • meeting-transcriber offers WhisperKit with 99+ languages or Parakeet TDT v3 with 25 European languages; meetily supports Whisper and Parakeet models for real-time transcription.
  • meeting-transcriber provides speaker separation with FluidAudio; meetily lists speaker identification as planned or coming soon.
  • Both projects are MIT licensed, but meetily has 31.6k stars and 3.5k forks, compared with 222 stars and 72 forks for meeting-transcriber.
  • meeting-transcriber offers a record-only mode and a localhost automation API in its Homebrew build; meetily stores recordings, transcripts, and models locally and distinguishes its Community Edition from separate PRO capabilities.

Choose meeting-transcriber if you…

  • need a macOS menu bar app that detects Teams, Zoom, and Webex meetings.
  • want separate speaker diarization for app and microphone tracks or a record-only workflow.
  • need to choose between WhisperKit and Parakeet based on language coverage, or import existing recordings.
Read the meeting-transcriber analysis →

Choose meetily if you…

  • want a desktop app with real-time transcription and platform-specific GPU acceleration.
  • prefer capturing microphone and system audio together with audio mixing features.
  • want to use Ollama or another supported provider for meeting summaries, or build meetily from source on Linux.
Read the meetily analysis →

Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects

This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.