agent-orchestrator vs codeg
Coding-agent workspaces compared
agent-orchestrator and codeg both help developers coordinate multiple coding agents and work across Git worktrees. agent-orchestrator centers on task planning and supervision through pull requests, CI, and review, while codeg brings agent conversations, histories, files, and tools into a shared workspace with several deployment options.
agent-orchestrator: Supervise Teams of Coding Agents
Orchestrator.inc is a Go-based desktop workspace for planning and supervising coding agents across a project. It isolates Git-backed tasks in branches and worktrees, then tracks agent activity, pull requests, CI, and reviews in a live Kanban across macOS, Windows, and Linux.
codeg: Coordinate AI Coding Agents with Agent Client Protocol
Codeg is a collaborative workspace for running and coordinating AI coding agents through the Agent Client Protocol. It brings agent conversations, sessions, code changes, and tasks into one experience across desktop, self-hosted server, Docker, and mobile.
| agent-orchestrator | codeg | |
|---|---|---|
| Language | Go | Rust |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 13.3k | 4k |
| Forks | 1.8k | 518 |
| Last analyzed | Oct 19, 2026 | Oct 19, 2026 |
Key differences
- agent-orchestrator uses a project orchestrator to plan and delegate tasks to workers; codeg emphasizes shared conversations, session search, resumption, and handoffs across agents.
- agent-orchestrator tracks worker activity alongside pull requests, CI, and review on a live Kanban board; codeg combines conversations with files, terminals, notes, and Git changes on a workspace canvas.
- agent-orchestrator is written in Go, while codeg is written in Rust.
- Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license.
- agent-orchestrator is a desktop application with a local daemon; codeg can run as a desktop app, self-hosted server, or Docker container, with mobile clients described in its documentation.
- The supplied repository figures list 12.7k stars and 746 open issues for agent-orchestrator, versus 3.8k stars and 286 open issues for codeg.
Choose agent-orchestrator if you…
- want a project-level agent to break goals into delegated worker tasks.
- need a live view of workers, pull requests, CI, and reviews through merge.
- prefer isolated Git-backed worker worktrees with the option to use an agent's native terminal interface.
Choose codeg if you…
- want to search, import, and resume sessions across agents.
- need conversations, files, terminals, notes, and Git changes together in one workspace.
- want desktop, self-hosted server, or Docker deployment options.
Compare the numbers side by side, or add more projects
This comparison is generated with AI from the OSRepos analyses of both projects. Always check each project's repository and documentation before choosing.